Physical Restitution: Vacating and Handing Back the Keys
Restitution of the premises is an obligation of result. It requires two things: the tenant must physically vacate (removing themselves and all occupants and their property), and they must actually deliver the keys to the landlord. The key handover is not a formality — it is the operative act that marks the completion of restitution.
A tenant who has vacated physically but has not returned the keys is still considered to be in occupation, and owes an occupation indemnity until actual handover occurs (Cass. 3e civ., 21 September 2022, n° 21-17.431; Cass. 3e civ., 16 March 2023, n° 21-25.002). This applies even if the tenant is not using the premises and even if the landlord has not indicated that they wish to take possession.
- Sending the keys to a commissaire de justice acting under the tenant’s mandate alone (Cass. 3e civ., 13 June 2001);
- Leaving keys at the commissaire de justice’s office for collection without attempting personal delivery (Cass. 3e civ., 17 November 2016);
- Dropping keys in a letterbox without the landlord’s agreement;
- Demanding that the landlord collect the keys from the premises.
Keys must be delivered at the landlord’s address or registered office (Cass. 3e civ., 5 November 2003). The tenant bears the burden of proving that keys were returned. The tenant is exonerated only where they can prove that the landlord refused to accept them (Cass. 3e civ., 7 February 2019; Cass. 3e civ., 3 December 2020).
The obligation to return in good condition runs with the lease and binds the last assignee. The current tenant is liable for degradations caused by their predecessors (Cass. 3e civ., 9 July 2003). This is softened where the landlord signed a new lease with the last assignee with knowledge of the existing state of the premises — in that case, the landlord is taken to have waived the right to hold the current tenant responsible for predecessors’ degradations (Cass. 3e civ., 6 March 2012).
The Condition of the Premises on Restitution
Without a Condition Report at Entry
Article 1731 of the Civil Code creates a double presumption where no condition report was drawn up at entry: the tenant is presumed to have received the premises in good repair, and is therefore presumed to be returning them in that state. In practice the burden falls on the landlord to prove degradation during the tenancy. This is rebuttable, but undated photographs are insufficient (CA Versailles, 12 September 2019). Since the Pinel Act of 2014, both entry and exit condition reports are compulsory under Art. L. 145-40-1 C. com.
With a Condition Report at Entry
Where an entry report exists, Article 1730 applies: the tenant must return the premises in the same state as they received them, except for deterioration due to age or force majeure. The report is not irrebuttable but is the primary benchmark. A mention of “nothing to report” means no abnormality was found, so a degradation noted at exit establishes a departure from the entry state. The report must be established jointly at entry; a unilateral entry report prepared without the tenant’s participation is not binding on the tenant (Cass. 3e civ., 29 April 2002).
Exceptions: Age and Force Majeure
The tenant is not responsible for deterioration resulting from normal use over time (vétusté) or from force majeure. These are statutory exceptions under Article 1730 that cannot be contracted away unless the lease expressly transfers responsibility to the tenant — and any such transfer must be explicit (Cass. 3e civ., 1 February 1989). Deterioration existing before the tenant took the premises does not fall on the tenant (Cass. 3e civ., 30 June 2010). The tenant can also be exonerated by showing that the deteriorations occurred without any fault on their part (Art. 1732 C. civ.).
Financial Consequences at Restitution
Tenant Improvements
Under Article 555 of the Civil Code, the landlord can choose to retain improvements made by the tenant (paying the higher of the added value or the cost of works) or to require demolition at the tenant’s expense. The parties usually vary this by lease clause, providing for free accession by the landlord, demolition, or the landlord’s option between the two.
Damages for Degradations: The June 2024 Change
The landlord’s right to damages for degradations has been clarified by three rulings of 27 June 2024 (Cass. 3e civ., 27 June 2024, n°² 22-10.298, 22-21.272 and 22-24.502). The court has returned to the orthodox position: the landlord must establish the existence of an actual prejudice. The 2021 position — that compensation was not contingent on carrying out repairs, incurring costs, or proving a loss of rental value — has been abandoned. The landlord must now demonstrate a real loss: inability to re-let due to poor condition, or a demonstrably lower reletting price. A landlord who has already let the premises to a new tenant without having to carry out repairs or accept worse terms will not be awarded damages for restitution defects.
Occupation Indemnity After Lease End
From the moment the lease ends and keys have not been handed back, an occupation indemnity is owed at market value — even if the tenant is not using the premises. The indemnity runs until actual key handover. It is also owed where the tenant delays completing contractual exit works; the occupation period covers the duration needed to complete those works (Cass. 3e civ., 19 May 2010).
The Security Deposit
The security deposit must be returned to the tenant when they hand back the keys and have performed their obligations. Retention is only justified where the landlord has an established claim (unpaid rent, charges, or the cost of making good degradations the tenant is responsible for). The deposit is a personal debt of whoever received it; a sale of the building does not automatically transfer the obligation to the purchaser unless expressly agreed in the sale.
The June 2024 Court of Cassation rulings mark a significant shift. A landlord who allowed a new tenant to completely refurbish the premises after the previous tenant’s exit, without having to contribute to those works and without accepting worse financial terms, cannot claim damages from the outgoing tenant for the state of restitution. Before proceeding with exit works discussions, landlords should document the reletting market value both before and after any remedial works and preserve evidence of any costs they have had to absorb or concessions they have had to make.
Whether you are a landlord assessing your compensation claim after an unsatisfactory exit, or a tenant facing demands for repairs or deposit retention, we advise on the restitution obligations, the evidential requirements, and the current standard for damages claims following the June 2024 rulings.
Book a ConsultationLegal Notice. This article is for general information and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. Laws and regulations may have changed since publication. Always seek qualified French legal advice on lease restitution matters.
Key Legal References
Return to condition at entry: tenant must return premises in the same state as received, except for deterioration due to age or force majeure; primary benchmark where entry condition report exists
Presumption without entry report: tenant presumed to have received premises in good repair and to be returning them in that state; burden on landlord to prove degradation
Tenant liability for degradations caused during the tenancy; tenant can be exonerated by showing degradations occurred without any fault on their part
Compulsory entry and exit condition reports in commercial leases: established jointly by the parties or by commissaire de justice in the event of disagreement; from Pinel Act 2014
Physical key handover to the landlord required for restitution to be complete; tenant who has vacated but not returned keys still owes an occupation indemnity
Occupation indemnity owed until keys are actually returned even if tenant is not using the premises
Tenant exonerated from occupation indemnity where landlord refused to accept the returned keys
Keys must be delivered at the landlord’s address or registered office; leaving keys at commissaire de justice’s office without attempted personal delivery is insufficient
Sending keys to commissaire de justice acting under the tenant’s mandate alone does not constitute valid handover
Leaving keys at commissaire de justice’s office for collection without attempting personal delivery: not valid handover
Last assignee liable for all degradations including those caused by their predecessors
Landlord who signed new lease with last assignee with knowledge of existing state of premises is taken to have waived right to hold current tenant responsible for predecessors’ degradations
Pre-existing deterioration at time of entry does not fall on the tenant
Landlord must establish the existence of an actual prejudice to obtain damages for degradations at restitution; prior position (compensation not contingent on incurring repair costs) abandoned
