Origin and Legal Basis
The Commission d'examen des pratiques commerciales — universally known by its acronym CEPC — was established by the loi n° 2001-420 du 15 mai 2001, the loi relative aux nouvelles régulations économiques, commonly referred to as the loi NRE. Its legal framework is now set out in Article L 440-1 of the Code de commerce, with implementing provisions in Articles D 440-1 et seq.
The loi NRE was part of a broader legislative effort to rebalance commercial relationships in the French distribution chain — particularly the relationships between large-scale retailers and their suppliers, which had been a persistent source of tension and legal disputes. The CEPC was designed to provide a neutral, expert, and confidential forum in which commercial practices could be examined for their conformity with the law, without the adversarial pressure of litigation. It fills a structural gap: between the private negotiation of commercial contracts and the enforcement mechanisms of the competition authority and the courts.
The Three Roles of the CEPC
What Falls Within the CEPC's Scope
The CEPC's jurisdiction is defined by the nature of the commercial relationship and the type of document or practice in question. The legal framework refers to "commercial relationships between producers, suppliers, and resellers" — a broad B2B category that covers both vertical relationships (between different levels of the distribution chain, such as a manufacturer and a distributor) and horizontal relationships (between operators at the same level, such as between competing resellers).
What the CEPC Cannot Do
What the CEPC Has Examined: Published Opinion Examples
The CEPC's published opinions cover a wide range of B2B commercial practices. Three examples from the source text illustrate the breadth of the topics it has addressed:
The CEPC examined the practice of reverse electronic auctions (enchères électroniques inversées) — in which suppliers bid down their prices in real time against each other — not only against the Code de commerce competition rules but also against the general contract law principles of the Code civil. This illustrates that the CEPC's legal analysis extends well beyond competition law specifically.
The CEPC examined the validity of publishing comparative performance studies of competing products, applying the comparative advertising rules in the Code de la consommation. The opinion shows that, despite the CEPC's B2B focus, it can and does apply consumer law rules where they are relevant to the commercial practice under examination — even though it cannot assess unfair terms under Art. L 212-1 C. consom.
In this opinion, the CEPC addressed the question of whether the parties to an apparently B2B contract might qualify as a consumer or non-professional — which would bring them within the consumer law regime, including the unfair terms rules the CEPC itself cannot apply. This opinion-type defines the boundary of the CEPC's own jurisdiction.
Publication of Opinions and Recommendations
Opinions: Discretionary Publication
The CEPC may decide to publish the opinions it adopts on its website (Art. D 440-8). Publication is at the Commission's discretion and does not require the consent of the party who made the referral. The opinions are available at www.economie.gouv.fr/cepc. Not all opinions are published — the CEPC takes into account business secrecy and the sensitivity of the information provided before deciding whether to make an opinion public.
Recommendations: Anonymity and Communication to the Minister
Where a recommendation follows a specific advisory referral, it must contain no indication that would allow the identification of the persons concerned. The recommendation is communicated to the Minister of the Economy and published on the Commission's decision. Unlike opinions, recommendations are general normative texts designed to shape sector-wide practices, and their publication is therefore less sensitive from a confidentiality standpoint.
Annual Report: Full Public Transparency
The CEPC's annual activity report — covering the opinions it has rendered, the recommendations it has adopted, and the commercial practices it has observed — is transmitted to the Government and to both chambers of Parliament, and is rendered public. The annual report is the most comprehensive source of information on where the CEPC is focusing its attention and what trends it is identifying in B2B commercial relationships.
The CEPC's annual report provides a unique window into the commercial practices that are attracting legal scrutiny in France's B2B distribution relationships — before those practices become the subject of litigation or enforcement action. Legal and compliance teams in businesses active in French distribution chains should monitor the annual report as a leading indicator of where commercial law risk is building. Practices the CEPC identifies as problematic or non-compliant frequently become the subject of DGCCRF investigations and litigation in subsequent years.
The CEPC is one of several institutions — alongside the Autorité de la concurrence and the DGCCRF — that shape the legal landscape for commercial relationships in France. Understanding how each institution works and how they interact is essential for any business operating in the French distribution chain.
Book a ConsultationThis article is for general information and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. Always seek qualified legal advice for your specific situation.
Get Advice
Contracting with a French Party?
We advise sellers and buyers on French sales law, warranties, retention of title and cross-border terms. Speak to our team.
Get Legal AdviceKey Legal References
CEPC roles and powers: advisory opinions, recommendations, observatory function, annual report
CEPC creation by loi relative aux nouvelles régulations économiques
Publication of CEPC opinions on website at Commission's discretion, without referrer's consent
CEPC has no mediation role — purely advisory
Reverse electronic auctions examined against Code de commerce competition rules and general contract law principles
Comparative product performance studies examined against comparative advertising rules in Code de la consommation
CEPC not competent to assess unfair contract terms under C. consom. Art. L 212-1; can determine whether parties qualify as consumer or professional
