APPENDICES TO PART ONE

Articles in this section · 12

Article Annexe 11-2 (suite 1)

French Public Health CodeIn force

Updated 30 Oct 2023

SCALE FOR ASSESSING THE DEGREE OF DISABILITY OF VICTIMS OF MEDICAL ACCIDENTS, IATROGENIC CONDITIONS OR NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE D. 1142-2

IV. - STOMATOLOGY

A. - Loss of teeth

Complete inapparent edentation

35 %

Loss of an incisor

1 %

Loss of a premolar or wisdom tooth in the arch

1 %

Loss of a canine or molar tooth

1,5 %

These rates will be reduced by half in the case of replacement by a mobile prosthesis and by two-thirds in the case of replacement by a fixed prosthesis.

In the event of complete loss of a tooth replaced by an implant-supported prosthesis: 0%.

Pulpal mortification of a tooth: 0.50%.

B. - Mandibular dysfunctions

Permanent limitation of mouth opening (measured between the free edge of the central incisors) :

Limited to 30 mm 5 %
Limited to 20 mm 17 %
Limited to 10 mm 25 %

Temporomandibular joint disorders :

Mild form :

- unilateral 3 %
- bilateral5 %
Severe form35 à 10 %

C. - Post-traumatic dental articulation disorders

(in proportion to the loss of masticatory capacity): 2 to 10%.

D. - Sensory neurological disorders

Hypoesthesia or anaesthesia with dysaesthesia in the territory of the supraorbital nerve

up to 3% of cases

Hypoesthesia or anaesthesia with dysaesthesia in the territory of the infraorbital nerve

including gingivodental deficit

up to 5

Hypoesthesia or anaesthesia with dysaesthesia in the inferior alveolar nerve territory

with lip incontinence including dental sensory deficit :

- unilateral

up to 5

- bilateral

5 à 12 %

Hypoesthesia or anaesthesia with dysaesthesia in the territory of the lingual nerve :

- unilateral

up to 5

- bilateral

10 à 12 %

E. - Motor neurological damage (see also ENT section)

Facial paralysis (not including ophthalmological complications) :

- unilateral5 à 15 %
- bilateral15 à 25 %

F. - Bucco-sinus or bucco-nasal communication

Depending on the site, surface and functional discomfort, including the consequences on swallowing and the impact on the quality of phonation: 2 to 15%.

G. - Salivary pathology

Salivary cutaneous fistula of parotid originup to 15% of cases

Frei's syndrome (per-prandial, laterofacial ephydrosis of the preauricular

preauricular and parotid region)

6 à 8 %

V. - OTOLARYNGOLOGY

I. - Hearing and otology

A. - Hearing loss

Hearing loss is determined on the basis of a thorough and meticulous clinical assessment and a paraclinical assessment, which must include at least a complete impedancemetry (tympanometry with a search for the stapedial reflex threshold), an initial subjective tone audiometry and a voice audiometry.

If necessary :

- the quality of the auditory field above 8,000 Hz will be assessed by high-frequency audiometry;

- the reality of the deficit may be confirmed by objective tests (acoustic otoemissions, early auditory evoked potentials).

Post-traumatic hypoacusis does not progress beyond 12 months.

Complete bilateral hearing loss: 60%.

Partial hearing loss.

The assessment should be carried out in two stages:

a) Assessment of the average hearing loss (AHL) in relation to the air conduction tonal deficit measured in decibels at 500, 1,000, 2,000 and 4,000 Hz by assigning weighting coefficients of 2, 4, 3 and 1 respectively. The sum is divided by 10. Please refer to the double entry table below to assess the rates:

Average hearing loss in dB

0 - 19

20 - 29

30 - 39

40 - 49

50 - 59

60 - 69

70 - 79

80 and over

0 - 19

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

20 - 29

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

18

30 - 39

4

6

8

10

12

15

20

25

40 - 49

6

8

10

12

15

20

25

30

50 - 59

8

10

12

15

20

25

30

35

60 - 69

10

12

15

20

25

30

40

45

70 - 79

12

14

20

25

30

40

50

55

80 and over

14

18

25

30

35

45

55

60

These are indicative rates which must be correlated with any previous condition and the physiological ageing of the hearing.

b) Comparison of this gross rate with the results of a voice audiometry to assess any auditory distortions (recruitment in particular) which aggravate functional discomfort.

The following table suggests the rates of increase which may be discussed in relation to the results of the preliminary pure-tone audiometry:

% discrimination

100 %

90 %

80 %

70 %

60 %

< 50 %

100 %

0

0

1

2

3

4

90 %

0

0

1

2

3

4

80 %

1

1

2

3

4

5

70 %

2

2

3

4

5

6

60 %

3

3

4

5

6

7

50 %

4

4

5

6

7

8

If hearing aids have been prescribed, the expert must describe the functional improvement obtained. This usually reduces the degree of disability by at least 25%.

B. - Tympanic lesions

An isolated dry perforation does not justify any specific PPI apart from that linked to the hearing loss.

In the case of otorrhea, a rate of 2 to 4% may be retained in addition to that caused by hearing loss.

C. - Tinnitus and painful hyperacusis

The intensity felt does not depend on the extent of the hearing loss.

There is no test to objectivise this disorder. The expert may, however, use subjective tinnitus measurement and recognised tests: DET questionnaire (measure of psychological distress), SEV questionnaire (subjective SEVérité scale).

In most cases, a cerebral habituation phenomenon occurs within 12 to 18 months. We can then propose a rate of up to 3% (to which must be added any rate adopted for hearing loss).

When the psycho-affective repercussions are severe, the disability rate must be determined within a multidisciplinary framework.

II. - Balance disorders

Balance is a multi-modal function that involves the vestibular, visual and proprioceptive systems. The aetiology of the disorder cannot therefore be stated unequivocally from the outset.

Balance disorders are often among the complaints expressed after cranial and/or cervical trauma.

The expert must carry out a methodical interview and a full clinical examination, looking in particular for iatrogenic orthostatic hypotension.

Videonystagmography is the complementary examination of choice. More recently introduced, the Equitest provides a global approach to a subject's balancing strategy, and can also be used to detect the "anorganic" component of a balance disorder.

The investigation of balance is inseparable from that of hearing.

In some cases, a neurological or ophthalmological opinion may be necessary.

The key to assessing functional discomfort is not the identification of a lesion, but the quality of the compensation strategy developed by the patient.

A. - Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV)

Cure can be obtained by Alain Sémont's liberatory manoeuvre (although 5 to 10% of recurrences occur in the following year).

Some sensation of "floating" or "instability" may persist.

Depending on the extent of clinical signs and paraclinical abnormalities: up to 4%.

B. - Unilateral peripheral vestibular disease

The rate of PPI cannot depend solely on the extent of the deficit, apparently quantified by a single caloric test:

areflexia, simple hyporeflectivity or ductal irritative syndrome. It is not the lesion itself that needs to be assessed, but its functional impact.

Using rigorous complementary investigations, the expert must assess the level and quality of central compensation for vestibular asymmetry and the reliability of the new balancing strategy adopted by the patient.

Depending on the results of these investigations: 3 to 8%.

C. - Bilateral peripheral destructive vestibular disease

This is very rarely post-traumatic. It most often occurs following the use of ototoxic drugs.

The subject is left with only vision and proprioception to manage balance.

The result of the new strategies used by the patient will be assessed by the quality of the optokinetic nystagmus and by the Equitest.

Depending on the results of these explorations: 10 to 20%.

D. - Otolith deficiency

When confirmed by videonystagmography and otolith evoked potentials: 3 to 5%.

E. - Central vestibular syndrome

This diagnosis must be confirmed in a multidisciplinary setting: oto-neuro-ophthalmology.

No specific ENT rate can be offered.

F. - Further investigations

When all further investigations are negative, the ENT expert must reject any specific PPI rate. Instability complaints should be considered in the context of a possible post-concussion syndrome.

III. - Facial motor impairment

A. - Facial paralysis

The expert may use House and Brackmann's 6-grade classification to assess the degree of damage:

- unilateral; depending on its degree: 5 to 15% ;

- bilateral (exceptional); depending on its degree: 15 to 25%.

Any ophthalmological complications should also be assessed.

Cosmetic damage will be assessed independently.

B. - Facial haemispasm

Not amenable to treatment; depending on the extent of the contracture and the frequency of spastic attacks: up to 10%.

IV. - Phonation disorders

Phonation involves several effectors: pulmonary bellows, glottic vibrator, supralaryngeal resonators.

Assessment must be global.

Any associated problems with swallowing and respiratory function will be assessed separately.

Complete aphonia: 25%.

Isolated partial dysphonia: up to 10%.

V. - Nasal ventilation disorders

Assessment will be based essentially on questioning and clinical examination, looking for any previous condition.

Examination with a Glaetzel mirror provides only very fragmentary and incomplete information. Only rhinomanometry can provide a more accurate assessment.

A. - Respiratory discomfort

Permanent unilateral (including possible repercussions on the sense of smell) depending on the extent of nocturnal repercussions: up to 3%.

Permanent bilateral according to the same criteria: up to 6%.

B. - Septal perforation

This may cause functional discomfort independent of respiratory problems.

If persistent: up to 3%.

C. - Sinusitis

Post-traumatic sinusitis is exceptional.

Depending on whether it is uni- or bilateral: up to 8%.

VI. - Olfaction disorders

Exploration of this sense currently involves only subjective odour perception and recognition tests.

These tests must be carried out on each nasal cavity.

A deficit of this type may or may not affect the subject's eating behaviour. The loss of smell itself is sometimes associated with odour perceptions without external stimuli (parosmia), which are generally unpleasant (cacosmia).

Total anosmia (loss of alert and pleasure functions).

Depending on whether or not there is an eating disorder: 5 to 8%.

Hyposmia, depending on its intensity and whether it is unilateral or bilateral: up to 3%.

The existence of parosmia may justify an additional specific rate of 2%.

The impact on taste is not added to the above rates.

Mariela Petrova

Need help applying this article to your situation?

A registered French Lawyer explains what applies to your business — in English, fixed fee.

within 48h

Fixed Fee

Talk to a lawyer
Common Questions

Working with a corporate lawyer in France — Q&A

Any time a strategic decision changes how the company is owned, governed or contractually bound — incorporation, fundraising, M&A, restructuring, shareholder agreements, or major commercial contracts. Earlier engagement always costs less than later remediation.

A notary (notaire) is a public officer who authenticates specific deeds (mainly real-estate transfers and certain family-law acts). A corporate lawyer (avocat) advises on strategy, negotiates and drafts company documents, and represents you in disputes. The two roles complement rather than overlap.

Yes — most of our clients are foreign suppliers, investors or holding entities. We bridge the gap between French law and your home jurisdiction's expectations and deliver everything bilingually.

The SAS (Société par Actions Simplifiée) is the default choice for most international structures: flexible governance, single shareholder allowed, no minimum capital, and works cleanly with foreign holding entities. We assess SARL, SA, SCI on the merits when the situation calls for it.

Yes — communications with a French avocat are protected by the secret professionnel (Article 66-5 of the Law of 31 December 1971). This protection is broader than the common-law attorney-client privilege and applies to written and oral exchanges.

We work on fixed fees for clearly scoped engagements (incorporation, contract drafting, audits) and on monthly retainers for ongoing advisory. Hourly billing is the exception, not the default. You always know the cost before work starts.

Typical timeline is 2–3 weeks from KYC kick-off to RCS registration, assuming standard documentation. Holding-company structures, foreign-shareholder identification or in-kind contributions can extend this — we flag the gating items at the first meeting.

Absolutely. We routinely coordinate with your in-house counsel, expert-comptable or notaire — pragmatic collaboration is the norm, not the exception. We send them everything they need to do their part without duplicating work.

Mariela Petrova

Mariela Petrova

Avocate au Barreau de Paris

Toque #C2396

15+ Years In Corporate Practice

English · French · Russian

Ready When You Are

Talk To A Corporate
Lawyer In France.

A 20–30 minute call, in English, to scope the engagement. No obligation, no preliminary fee. You will leave the call with a clear view of what the work will cover and what it will cost.

First EngagementFixed Fee

Talk to a French lawyer.

Reply within 24 hours.

Communications protected by professional secrecy — secret professionnel de l'avocat, Article 66-5 of the Law of 31 December 1971.

Continue Reading

Related corporate services in France

01 / Setup

Setting up a French company

Choose between SAS, SARL, SA or SCI — and structure your first French entity around how you actually plan to operate.

Read More
02 / Operating

French commercial contracts

Distribution, agency, supply, services and IP licences — drafted around the protections French law actually gives.

Read More
03 / Disputes

Business disputes & litigation

Shareholder conflicts, commercial breaches and pre-litigation strategy — handled by the same team that knows the file.

Read More