Section 7: Prudential provisions

Articles in this section · 18

Article L511-41-3

French Monetary and Financial CodeIn force

Updated 7 Nov 2023

I.-The Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution may order a person referred to in 1°, 4°, 9° and 10° of A of I of Article L. 612-2, a class 1 bis investment firm or, with the exception of firms referred to in 2° of I of Article L. 613-34 which are not Class 1a investment firms, to a person mentioned in I and, where applicable, II of this Article to take, within a specified period, any measures intended to restore or strengthen its financial or liquidity situation, to improve its management methods or to ensure that its organisation is suited to its activities or development objectives, or, where the information received or requested by the AMF for the purposes of the supervision is such as to establish that the person is likely to fail, within a period of twelve months, to comply with the obligations laid down in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 by a provision of this Title and Title III of this Book or of a regulation adopted for its implementation or by any other legislative or regulatory provision, non-compliance with which entails non-compliance with the aforementioned provisions.

II. - The Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution may also impose on the undertaking an additional capital requirement in excess of the minimum amount provided for by the applicable regulations and require the application to the assets of a specific provisioning policy or a specific treatment with regard to capital requirements.

The AMF shall impose the additional capital requirement provided for in the preceding paragraph in any of the following cases:

1° The undertaking does not have appropriate processes in place to maintain at all times the amount, type and distribution of internal capital that it considers appropriate, nor effective processes for identifying, managing and monitoring its risks;

2° Risks or elements of risks are not covered or are insufficiently covered by the capital requirements laid down by Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 and by Chapter 2 of Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2017 ;

3° The Authority considers that the implementation of other measures would not be likely to sufficiently improve the arrangements, mechanisms and strategy of the undertaking within an appropriate period of time;

3°a The value adjustments made in accordance with Article 105 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 for positions in the trading book are insufficient to enable the firm to sell or hedge its positions quickly without exposing itself to significant losses under normal market conditions ;

4° It appears from the supervision and assessment of the prudential position of the undertaking that failure to comply with the requirements governing the use of internal approaches to risk assessment, as provided for in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013, is likely to result in inadequate capital requirements ;

5° On several occasions, the level of own funds of the undertaking has not made it possible to comply with the recommendations communicated in accordance with III ;

6° Other situations specific to the institution are considered by the competent authority as likely to give rise to significant supervisory concerns.

An additional capital requirement may only be imposed by the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution in order to cover risks or elements of risks arising from the activities carried out by the undertaking, including risks or elements of risks arising from certain economic and market developments which have an impact on the risk profile of the undertaking.

IIa. - On the basis of its assessments and controls carried out in accordance with the provisions of the first paragraph of Article L. 511-41-1-C, the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution determines the overall level of own funds that it deems appropriate for each undertaking and on the basis of which it draws up its recommendations on additional own funds.

Its recommendations, communicated to each undertaking, result from the difference between, on the one hand, the overall level of own funds mentioned in the first paragraph and, on the other hand, the amount of own funds required under Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013, Chapter 2 of Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2017, II of this Article and, as the case may be, I of Article L. 511-41-1-A or Article 92(1a) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013, as applicable.

Failure to comply with these recommendations shall not result in the implementation of the restrictions referred to in X of Article L. 511-41-1-A where the undertaking meets the capital requirements of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 and Chapter 2 of Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2017, the applicable additional capital requirement set in accordance with II and, where applicable, the overall capital cushion requirement referred to in I of Article L. 511-41-1-1 or the leverage ratio buffer requirement mentioned in Article 92(1a) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013.

IIb. - The requirement referred to in II and the recommendations referred to in IIa are notified to the members of the resolution college.

III. - When the soundness of the financial position of a credit institution, a class 1 bis investment firm or a finance company is compromised or likely to be compromised, the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution may require the firm in question to:

1° Allocate all or part of its net profits to strengthening its capital base;

2° Limit variable remuneration as a percentage of total net income;

3° Publish additional information.

IV. - The Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution may also order a credit institution, a class 1 bis investment firm or a finance company to comply with a specific liquidity requirement, including restrictions relating to maturity mismatches between assets and liabilities. The Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution shall determine the specific liquidity requirement it imposes having regard in particular to:

1° The extent and characteristics of the liquidity risks to which this person is exposed given its particular business model;

2° the systems, processes and mechanisms implemented by that person, relating in particular to liquidity risk; and

3° The results of the control and assessment of its prudential situation.

V. - The Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution shall take the measures provided for in this Article, taking into account, where applicable, the provisions of the fourth and fifth paragraphs ofArticle L. 511-41-1 C.

Mariela Petrova

Need help applying this article to your situation?

A registered French Lawyer explains what applies to your business — in English, fixed fee.

within 48h

Fixed Fee

Talk to a lawyer
Common Questions

Working with a corporate lawyer in France — Q&A

Any time a strategic decision changes how the company is owned, governed or contractually bound — incorporation, fundraising, M&A, restructuring, shareholder agreements, or major commercial contracts. Earlier engagement always costs less than later remediation.

A notary (notaire) is a public officer who authenticates specific deeds (mainly real-estate transfers and certain family-law acts). A corporate lawyer (avocat) advises on strategy, negotiates and drafts company documents, and represents you in disputes. The two roles complement rather than overlap.

Yes — most of our clients are foreign suppliers, investors or holding entities. We bridge the gap between French law and your home jurisdiction's expectations and deliver everything bilingually.

The SAS (Société par Actions Simplifiée) is the default choice for most international structures: flexible governance, single shareholder allowed, no minimum capital, and works cleanly with foreign holding entities. We assess SARL, SA, SCI on the merits when the situation calls for it.

Yes — communications with a French avocat are protected by the secret professionnel (Article 66-5 of the Law of 31 December 1971). This protection is broader than the common-law attorney-client privilege and applies to written and oral exchanges.

We work on fixed fees for clearly scoped engagements (incorporation, contract drafting, audits) and on monthly retainers for ongoing advisory. Hourly billing is the exception, not the default. You always know the cost before work starts.

Typical timeline is 2–3 weeks from KYC kick-off to RCS registration, assuming standard documentation. Holding-company structures, foreign-shareholder identification or in-kind contributions can extend this — we flag the gating items at the first meeting.

Absolutely. We routinely coordinate with your in-house counsel, expert-comptable or notaire — pragmatic collaboration is the norm, not the exception. We send them everything they need to do their part without duplicating work.

Mariela Petrova

Mariela Petrova

Avocate au Barreau de Paris

Toque #C2396

15+ Years In Corporate Practice

English · French · Russian

Ready When You Are

Talk To A Corporate
Lawyer In France.

A 20–30 minute call, in English, to scope the engagement. No obligation, no preliminary fee. You will leave the call with a clear view of what the work will cover and what it will cost.

First EngagementFixed Fee

Talk to a French lawyer.

Reply within 24 hours.

Communications protected by professional secrecy — secret professionnel de l'avocat, Article 66-5 of the Law of 31 December 1971.

Continue Reading

Related corporate services in France

01 / Setup

Setting up a French company

Choose between SAS, SARL, SA or SCI — and structure your first French entity around how you actually plan to operate.

Read More
02 / Operating

French commercial contracts

Distribution, agency, supply, services and IP licences — drafted around the protections French law actually gives.

Read More
03 / Disputes

Business disputes & litigation

Shareholder conflicts, commercial breaches and pre-litigation strategy — handled by the same team that knows the file.

Read More