Section 3: Specific inspection regime

Articles in this section · 7

Article L613-32

French Monetary and Financial CodeIn force

Updated 7 Nov 2023

I.-The Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution shall exchange with the competent authorities within the meaning of Articles L. 511-21 and L. 532-16, information relating to credit institutions and investment firms benefiting from the freedom of establishment or the freedom to provide services concerning :

a) The management and ownership of these institutions or undertakings in order to facilitate their supervision and the examination of the conditions for their authorisation;

b) Other elements likely to facilitate their monitoring, in particular with regard to liquidity, solvency, deposit guarantees, limitation of large exposures, administrative and accounting organisation, concentration and internal control mechanisms;

c) Elements likely to influence the risk represented by these institutions or undertakings;

It shall inform the same authorities:

a) Any findings relating to the financial situation of these institutions or undertakings insofar as this information is relevant for the protection of depositors or investors in the host State or for the financial stability of the host State;

b) the occurrence of a liquidity crisis or a reasonable risk of such a crisis occurring and the measures taken in this context.

II - At the request of the competent authorities of the host Member State of a credit institution, an investment firm other than an asset management company, an electronic money institution, a payment institution or an account information service provider benefiting from the freedom of establishment in accordance with Articles L. 511-27 or L. 532-23, the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution shall inform those competent authorities of the measures it has taken following the findings and information communicated to it. Where the competent authorities of the host Member State themselves take measures on the grounds that these measures are not appropriate, the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution may refer the matter to the European Banking Authority in accordance with Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010.

III - The Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution may ask the competent authorities of the home Member State of a credit institution or investment firm benefiting from the freedom of establishment in accordance with Articles L. 511-22 or L. 532-18-1 for information on the measures they have taken in response to the findings and information it has provided. If it considers that the competent authorities of the home Member State have not taken appropriate action, it may, after informing those authorities, the European Banking Authority and the European Securities and Markets Authority, take appropriate measures to prevent further infringements in order to protect depositors or investors or to preserve the stability of the financial system.

IV - The Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution may refer the matter to the European Banking Authority if a request for cooperation, in particular for the exchange of information, as provided for in this Article, has been rejected or has not been acted upon within a reasonable period of time.

V.-For the assessment of the condition set out in point (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 23(1) of Regulation (EU) 2019/2033, the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution may, in its capacity as the authority responsible for the supervision of an investment firm, request the competent authority of the home Member State of a clearing member to provide information relating to the margin model and the parameters used to calculate the margin requirement of the investment firm concerned.

At the request of the competent authority of the home Member State of an investment firm, the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution may, in its capacity as the authority responsible for the supervision of a credit institution or investment firm that is a member of a clearing house, provide information relating to the margin model and parameters used to calculate the margin requirement of the investment firm concerned for the purposes of assessing the condition set out in point (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 23(1) of Regulation (EU) 2019/2033.

A decree in the Conseil d'Etat shall specify the conditions of application of this Article.

Mariela Petrova

Need help applying this article to your situation?

A registered French Lawyer explains what applies to your business — in English, fixed fee.

within 48h

Fixed Fee

Talk to a lawyer
Common Questions

Working with a corporate lawyer in France — Q&A

Any time a strategic decision changes how the company is owned, governed or contractually bound — incorporation, fundraising, M&A, restructuring, shareholder agreements, or major commercial contracts. Earlier engagement always costs less than later remediation.

A notary (notaire) is a public officer who authenticates specific deeds (mainly real-estate transfers and certain family-law acts). A corporate lawyer (avocat) advises on strategy, negotiates and drafts company documents, and represents you in disputes. The two roles complement rather than overlap.

Yes — most of our clients are foreign suppliers, investors or holding entities. We bridge the gap between French law and your home jurisdiction's expectations and deliver everything bilingually.

The SAS (Société par Actions Simplifiée) is the default choice for most international structures: flexible governance, single shareholder allowed, no minimum capital, and works cleanly with foreign holding entities. We assess SARL, SA, SCI on the merits when the situation calls for it.

Yes — communications with a French avocat are protected by the secret professionnel (Article 66-5 of the Law of 31 December 1971). This protection is broader than the common-law attorney-client privilege and applies to written and oral exchanges.

We work on fixed fees for clearly scoped engagements (incorporation, contract drafting, audits) and on monthly retainers for ongoing advisory. Hourly billing is the exception, not the default. You always know the cost before work starts.

Typical timeline is 2–3 weeks from KYC kick-off to RCS registration, assuming standard documentation. Holding-company structures, foreign-shareholder identification or in-kind contributions can extend this — we flag the gating items at the first meeting.

Absolutely. We routinely coordinate with your in-house counsel, expert-comptable or notaire — pragmatic collaboration is the norm, not the exception. We send them everything they need to do their part without duplicating work.

Mariela Petrova

Mariela Petrova

Avocate au Barreau de Paris

Toque #C2396

15+ Years In Corporate Practice

English · French · Russian

Ready When You Are

Talk To A Corporate
Lawyer In France.

A 20–30 minute call, in English, to scope the engagement. No obligation, no preliminary fee. You will leave the call with a clear view of what the work will cover and what it will cost.

First EngagementFixed Fee

Talk to a French lawyer.

Reply within 24 hours.

Communications protected by professional secrecy — secret professionnel de l'avocat, Article 66-5 of the Law of 31 December 1971.

Continue Reading

Related corporate services in France

01 / Setup

Setting up a French company

Choose between SAS, SARL, SA or SCI — and structure your first French entity around how you actually plan to operate.

Read More
02 / Operating

French commercial contracts

Distribution, agency, supply, services and IP licences — drafted around the protections French law actually gives.

Read More
03 / Disputes

Business disputes & litigation

Shareholder conflicts, commercial breaches and pre-litigation strategy — handled by the same team that knows the file.

Read More